The top negative attributes, according to the survey, were environment—climate, park space, natural resources (58%); health and safety (45%); and image (42%).
Excuse me, fool?
Park space?
Honey, please...
And might I add, suck it.
Natural resources???
Have seen our lake?
When your oceans and streams have all run dry, you'll come weeping your dry tears to us - but we're smart enough to protect that resource from being abused by the kind of people who rank image as a reason not to move to city that has pretty much everything you could want from the urban experience for 1/3 of the cost of other cities.
You have no idea what you're missing - but I guess that just means more parks, water, medical research, world-class arts and culture and cuisine for me!
1 comment:
Have the people who rated and wrote this article ever visited the cities they are talking about? They have Las Vegas as in the top 4?? Vegas?? Seriously? Who would want to live there? Visit? ABSOLUTELY. Live there? You simply can't afford it and it's nothing but hot, brown, desert.
Cleveland has green, water, and great neighborhoods.
Humph. I don't even live in the state any more and that pissed me off!
Post a Comment